Right here’s FRESH AIR. I’m Dave Davies in this day for Terry Atrocious.

When U.S. Condominium Speaker Nancy Pelosi grow to be first elected to Congress, there wasn’t a ladies people’s relaxation room finish to the Condominium ground, and it’d be plenty of years sooner than ladies people had been allowed to do on pants in the chamber. Issues maintain changed since then. Pelosi has now led the Democratic Rating together’s Condominium caucus for 18 years, and our visitor at Time, national political correspondent Molly Ball, says she’s fashioned her negotiating skills to outmaneuver President Trump again and again in protection battles.

Paul’s new book traces Pelosi’s political skills encourage to her roots in her father’s Democratic machine in Baltimore. She describes how Pelosi outworked and outthought male opponents to ascend the leadership ladder in Congress, why she grew to grow to be the most traditional device of Republicans in congressional elections and, a little bit surprisingly, why she found working with President Obama so subtle. Apart from her work at Time, Molly Ball is a political analyst for CNN. Previously, she’s reported for The Atlantic, Politico and diversified media organizations. Her new book is legendary as “Pelosi.” I spoke with Molly Ball from my dwelling in Philadelphia. She grow to be at her dwelling in Arlington, Va.

Well, Molly Ball, welcome to FRESH AIR. You also can very effectively be working at dwelling – marvelous? – luxuriate in each person else, with three young people and your husband. And I’m attracted to how reporting in Washington has changed with the pandemic. You know, this is a metropolis that’s correct paunchy of, you realize, suggestions and rumors and gossip and tales and all forms of verbal substitute. Quite a bit of it be digital, but now people can’t surely social gathering. How does it surely feel diversified?

MOLLY BALL: In truth, I beget different what you talk to in Washington occurs when people waft into – marvelous? – when we’re spherical each diversified, the reporters and our sources and the politicians and so forth. And different people catch this roughly incestuous, but it is miles, for better or worse, a enormous device that that form of gossip network that you just describe is fueled. In boom that is all a chunk of bit extra mighty, to lend a hand up a correspondence with people and to form of know what the scuttlebutt is. But furthermore the roughly reporting I attain – I’m now not essentially a Capitol Hill correspondent. I attain different traveling across the nation, meeting people, making an strive to, you realize, glance the jam on the bottom with my possess eyes, and that is totally stopped.

DAVIES: So let’s focus on Nancy Pelosi. You know, many of us’s image of Nancy Pelosi is that of a prosperous San Francisco liberal, which she is, but her political roots are surely very diversified. Divulge us about her background, her family.

BALL: Indubitably one of her mentors earlier in her occupation, Jack Murtha, fashioned to boom about her, don’t dispute she’s from San Francisco. She’s from Baltimore. And that’s the explanation each literally marvelous and marvelous in a deeper sense, marvelous? Her father grow to be a congressman from Baltimore after which grew to grow to be the mayor of Baltimore. He came out of the machine politics of Baltimore, a Democratic metropolis. She grow to be born in 1940, when her father grow to be already in Congress. So literally from the day she grow to be born, she grow to be fragment of this very Catholic, very Democratic, very Italian family that grow to be wrathful about the political lifetime of the metropolis and the nation.

And that machine politics, as you realize from Philadelphia, grow to be very worthy about the form of tribes and factions of the metropolis. The diversified ethnicities all had their possess little neighborhoods, and so all of them had a form of boss who would possibly perchance perchance ship their votes, in overall in substitute for something. So when you explore the roughly deal-maker that Nancy Pelosi is, when you explore the roughly negotiating that she does on Capitol Hill, I beget different it does hint encourage to her roots in Baltimore.

DAVIES: What about Nancy Pelosi’s mother? Divulge us about her.

BALL: Her mother’s very major to her, I beget on the least as major as her father. And one in all the things I tried to attain in the book grow to be form of restore the importance of her mother to her lifestyles. You know, I beget inevitably on myth of her father grow to be a baby-kisser, her mother form of gets erased from this tale, but she grow to be very worthy fashioned by her mother. And she or he talks very frankly, which I beget is intelligent, about how stifled her mother grow to be. Her mother had different ambitions that she wasn’t ready to meet merely on myth of she grow to be a girl. She wished to be an auctioneer. She wished to pass to guidelines college. She wished to maintain her possess alternate. And all of these dreams had been thwarted on myth of she had to cease dwelling and develop the young people and lend a hand the dwelling and on myth of, comparatively frankly, her husband would now not let her.

There grow to be a level where she had a alternate. She’d invented and patented a beauty product, and she wished to promote it nationally. But she wanted her husband’s signature in divulge to attain that, and he would now not give it to her. So I beget it fashioned her that her mother grow to be stifled in that device. But it furthermore fashioned her that her mother grow to be a surely stable and aggressive woman, a form of – I manufacture now not desire to be stereotypical, but, you realize, the form of fiery Italian American mother who – there are family tales about how she once punched a ballotworker in the face. She grow to be identified to – she once build LBJ in his subject and told off Ronald Reagan. So this grow to be now not anyone who grow to be very much very much surprised to catch in people’s faces, and I beget that’s absolutely a attribute you furthermore explore in her daughter.

DAVIES: You know, and the roughly metropolis machine politics that her family grow to be wrathful about capabilities – you realize, it be about loyalty and favors, but it be furthermore correct about an unpleasant lot of laborious work – facet road lists and radiant where your votes are and turning them out. And there is different laborious work enthusiastic. Nancy Pelosi, then Nancy D’Alesandro, grew up when the machine grow to be comparatively active. Did she play a position herself?

BALL: She did. Her mother grow to be to blame for about a things in the family as form of the brains of the political operation. One grow to be the Women people’s Democratic Club that operated out of the basement, and in boom that they did different that racy work you can also very effectively be talking about – pounding the pavement, doing the precincts and making poke all the things grow to be in the marvelous subject. And then furthermore the make a selection file, which is the diversified facet of what you can also very effectively be talking about, the form of constituent services and products operation, where there grow to be a checklist that grow to be maintained in the family’s entrance room of the total things – the total favors people wanted from – whether it grow to be their mayor or their congressman.

And so from the time she grow to be about Eleven, Nancy D’Alesandro grow to be responsible of being in that entrance room and conserving that make a selection file, telling people – answering the telephone and telling them where they would possibly perchance perchance high-tail if they wanted to catch into metropolis effectively being facility or wanted abet getting housing or any of the form of authorities services and products. So she grow to be a surely active fragment of that operation from a entertaining early age.

And I beget the level you construct about how laborious that work is is major on myth of it be furthermore very person, marvelous? Right here’s politics at a surely person stage where you realize each single voter, and likewise you realize what they care about, and likewise you realize where they stay, and likewise you can also very effectively be turning them out precinct by precinct, block by block. So I beget that that’s surely major to her sense of politics as effectively.

DAVIES: So Nancy grows up, goes to Catholic college, goes to college and surely, after college, gets a job in a senator’s office, where, ironically, Steny Hoyer, who would later be her No. 2 in Congress for so a long time, grow to be furthermore employed. This grow to be form of the ruin of day of the feminist wave of the ’60s. Did Nancy explore her – Nancy D’Alesandro explore herself as a occupation woman?

BALL: I beget she did. She, luxuriate in her mother, wished to pass to guidelines college and never ended up doing so. And she or he did capture this job in the senator’s office. But she furthermore met the individual that would grow to be her husband while they had been each in college. And so she ended up, roughly luxuriate in her mother, giving up all of these dreams in divulge to grow to be a housewife.

Now, she never stopped doing her political activities, being active in the Democratic Rating together, being a volunteer and pushing the stroller while distributing leaflets, but she didn’t in the present day maintain a occupation – the truth is, didn’t maintain a occupation until many, a long time later, and it be a form of intelligent irony of her lifestyles that even even though she observed the form of entice that her mother had fallen into, she ended up doing virtually the an identical factor after she graduated from college.

DAVIES: So she raised 5 young people but stayed active in the social gathering, held fundraisers at her dwelling. How did she catch into formal politics, into the Democratic Rating together in California?

BALL: Well, her first ever precise office – office with some form of power, with some form of vote – grow to be the San Francisco Library Board in 1975. And I dispute this narrative in the book of how the mayor on the time, Joe Alioto, known as her up and requested her to capture this procure 22 situation on the San Francisco Library Commission. And she or he grew to grow to be him down. She talked about, effectively, you realize, I’m perfectly satisfied being a volunteer. I’m satisfied to abet. I manufacture now not need that roughly qualified subject. And even even though she map to be him something of a chauvinist, a form of worn-long-established man, he reprimanded her.

He talked about, no. You also can very effectively be doing the work. You would possibly want to maintain something to expose for it. You would possibly want to maintain the skill that incorporates it. It’s essential to be ready to construct choices. And this grow to be surely a revelation for her. And when she and I talked about it, she described it as a form of feminist moment where she realized that, yes, she need to be ready to maintain that roughly power if she grow to be going to be doing the total work. And all the things form of changed for her once she had that qualified subject. She realized that, seriously as a girl, when you had been correct form of talking, no one would possibly perchance hear to you. But when you had a vote, they’d to admire you. They’d to hear to your voice.

DAVIES: She gets into Congress in 1987. And now not many politicians construct their first speed at elected office for Congress and snatch. She, in a device, grow to be roughly in the marvelous subject on the marvelous time. A congressman died. His major other took the seat. She purchased colon most cancers and talked about that Nancy need to speed for the seat. But she silent had to grab it. It grow to be a field of 14 people, including one which grow to be comparatively audacious. How’d she pull it off?

BALL: Well, I beget there are surely different people in the Congress this day who that’s their first office. But that’s form of (laughter) one other dialogue. But yeah, she did need to fight for it no subject having the deathbed endorsement of her friend, Sala Burton, who’d held the seat sooner than her premature loss of life of colon most cancers. And she or he surely did mannequin her operation on the politics that she learned in Baltimore, on counting each vote, on radiant the neighborhoods block by block and precinct by precinct.

She knew the imprint of revealing up. She grow to be a tireless campaigner. She’d be up at 5 in the morning waving signs for the commuters. And she or he’d be out unhurried at evening, you realize, talking at a bingo parlor or a girl’s bridge club. And so her important opponent grow to be a man named Harry Britt, who grow to be form of the successor of the infamous Harvey Milk, the tragically assassinated member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. And this grow to be at a time when the AIDS crisis grow to be surely approaching the national radar.

And if elected, Harry Britt, her opponent, would were the first openly homosexual man elected to Congress. So quite a lot of the advertising and marketing campaign grow to be about who would possibly perchance perchance better signify the homosexual neighborhood. And Nancy Pelosi talked about the total connections she had, her skill to be efficient in Washington. But her important opponent’s argument grow to be, now we need to be represented by one in all our possess in Congress. And she or he won entertaining narrowly. She won – there grow to be – it grow to be form of two rounds of voting. And she or he won that first spherical by correct about a thousand votes.

DAVIES: The diversified enormous fragment of it grow to be money, marvelous? She raised different money. And she or he, at this level, had family wealth to contribute, too.

BALL: That is marvelous. Her husband grow to be a banker and financier. They lived in Fresh York for about a years sooner than shifting to his fatherland in San Francisco. And he grew to grow to be comparatively a hit. So even at that time in 1987, they had been comparatively effectively-off. And yes, she build moderately different her possess money into the speed moreover to being ready to develop funds. Attributable to she had this background as a fundraiser, on myth of she’d spent so worthy time raising money for diversified politicians, she grow to be then ready to call in numerous these favors. And she or he outspent the total relaxation of the field mixed to grab that speed.

DAVIES: You write that after she purchased to Congress, she already knew 200 representatives and senators in my thought and that many owed her a make a selection. That is entertaining excellent for a freshman. Why grow to be that?

BALL: Or now not it is very irregular for a freshman member of Congress. But she had helped so many of us catch to Congress. She had held all of these fundraisers in her dwelling. Her dwelling in San Francisco had grow to be a form of effectively-identified ruin on the fundraising circuit. So now not correct San Francisco politicians, but politicians from all around the do the nation who had been coming via California to develop money would ruin at their dwelling.

She furthermore spent a term because the finance chair of the Democratic Senatorial Marketing campaign Committee, essentially raising money for the total Senate candidates in now not easy races in 1986. In boom that intended that she purchased to know different senators and helped different them. And different them grew to admire her via that and furthermore, perchance, owed her a make a selection. So – and this grow to be precisely what she ran on.

Her slogan when she ran for office that first time grow to be, a voice that will be heard. And it grow to be all about her connections and her skill to be efficient in Washington, which, when you judge about it, is entertaining routine for anyone who’s never surely been in office sooner than. In truth, one in all her advertising and marketing campaign consultants regarded at this proposed slogan and talked about, wait a minute. We are going to speed a first-time candidate on this thought that they are efficient and achieved? And the reply grow to be, yes. That is what we’re going to attain. And it ended up working.

DAVIES: Molly Ball is the national political correspondent for Time. Her new book is “Pelosi.” We are going to talk extra after a ruin. Right here’s FRESH AIR.


DAVIES: Right here’s FRESH AIR. And we’re talking with Molly Ball. She is the national political correspondent for Time and a political analyst on CNN. Her new book is legendary as “Pelosi.”

You know, different people lend a hand in Congress for a long time but never grow to be leaders. They are active on their committees. Nancy Pelosi determined, first, in 1988, she would speed for one in all these leadership posts, a whip. She stayed at it, finally grow to be elected the whip. She grew to grow to be the chief of the caucus in 2002. They had been in the minority. So she told the put up of minority chief after which finally grew to grow to be speaker in 2007 after the Democrats won the majority in Congress in 2006. But running for these leadership posts is a chunk of diversified from correct serving in Congress. Divulge us how you attain it. How did she put together to grab these inside battles for leadership?

BALL: It requires building different strengthen among your colleagues. So which implies raising money on your colleagues, campaigning on your colleagues, helping them catch elected and cease elected. It ability proving that you just maintain the form of chops to attain the job, proving that you just realize the comely facts of the protection, you realize the device in which the Condominium works and capabilities. But it be different correct building these relationships.

And curiously, even even though she came from the liberal fly of the caucus, from a entertaining early level in her occupation, she grow to be building relationships with the extra practical and conservative Democrats in the Condominium. And she or he grew to grow to be guests with a form of crusty, worn chauvinist from Pennsylvania, Jack Murtha, who grow to be identified for his work on protection spending. And on myth of he observed something in her that made him capture her seriously, he grew to grow to be a form of wanted validator for her.

You’ve got to endure in mind, when she purchased to the Condominium in 1987, out of 435 contributors of the Condominium, there had been most intelligent 23 ladies people. So she wasn’t surely going to catch wherever by getting the total ladies people in the Condominium to vote for her. There correct weren’t that many. She wanted to catch the total males to capture her seriously. She wanted to catch them to explore her as anyone who would possibly perchance perchance attain this job and wasn’t correct a form of dilettante, as she grow to be in overall caricatured. So getting these older and extra conservative and male contributors to capture her seriously and to explore her as a force to be reckoned with grow to be surely wanted to her being ready to grab that subject.

DAVIES: Correct. And, you realize, you talked about that in the 2000 congressional election cycle, she donated Three.9 million to diversified Democratic candidates. That is totally a device to grab different guests. The diversified factor grow to be correct the sheer stage of labor and the stamina she showed. What had been her days luxuriate in?

BALL: She has continuously had a surely excellent quantity of vitality. She doesn’t need different sleep. I’ve never seen her expend an complete meal (laughter). She appears to – she doesn’t drink espresso. She doesn’t drink alcohol. She appears to stay mostly on darkish chocolate and chocolate ice cream, which she eats each day. But she has this impossible stage of vitality. And she or he traces different it to being a mother. And as a mother myself, I establish with this a chunk of bit. I beget you catch, when you grow to be a mother for the first time – worthy less when you maintain 5 young people – that the volume of skill that you just intend you had correct will increase exponentially when you – correct on myth of it be so worthy work to protect up cramped young people.

And so different her vitality derived from having been – having had 5 young people in the subject of six years, and having to develop this titanic family. That form of makes you the chief of a caucus, in a device. And I beget some of it is miles correct pure. I beget some of it has correct purchased to be the device in which that she is obviously. I’ve surely requested her this seek recordsdata from. I’m absolutely now not the first to quiz, effectively, where attain you catch all this vitality? How attain you attain it? And she or he’ll correct provide you this form of smooth explore and issue, effectively, I’m Italian. We maintain gigantic stamina. And I beget she surely believes that she’s correct genetically trusty for being Italian.

DAVIES: You know, the diversified intelligent factor is ready having – raising a titanic family and, luxuriate in, being a leader in a congressional caucus is, you realize, you close up having to be very, very efficient with your time and catch things accomplished and but maintain immense persistence to tackle these that dispute they’re major and would possibly perchance throw tantrums and need to be sorted.

BALL: That is marvelous. If you occur to judge about it, politicians and little toddlers maintain plenty in traditional, marvelous?

DAVIES: (Laughter).

BALL: They’re egomaniacs. They’re self-centered. They’re unreasonable. They desire all the things and in boom that they wish it now. And they do now not appear to be surely attracted to listening to why you would possibly want to catch – you’ll want to them to attain something else. So I attain dispute that managing a caucus is plenty luxuriate in managing a titanic family. And I beget she did be taught plenty from that. And, you realize, a friend of Nancy Pelosi’s, when she grow to be silent a youngish mother, talked about she knew she grow to be destined for success in politics when she observed all 5 young people folding their possess laundry.

And the device in which she ran the dwelling grow to be disciplined. It grow to be efficient. It grow to be, you realize, her – she now not steadily ever – I surely maintain a laborious time believing this. But her young people issue she now not steadily ever had to scold them on myth of she would correct give them that chilly glare of disappointment. And the disgrace that they would possibly perchance surely feel for disappointing her grow to be sufficient to construct them behave. And so I beget you explore that in the device in which she manages the Condominium Democratic Caucus as effectively, that she doesn’t in overall need to raise the hammer down and surely punish people on myth of they’re correct so very much very much surprised of disappointing her.

DAVIES: Molly Ball is political correspondent for Time and an analyst for CNN. Her new book is “Pelosi.” She’ll be encourage to talk extra about Condominium Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s occupation after a ruin. And Kevin Whitehead reviews a new album by saxophonist Dayna Stephens’ trio. I’m Dave Davies, and this is FRESH AIR.


DAVIES: Right here’s FRESH AIR. I’m Dave Davies in for Terry Atrocious. We’re talking with Time national political correspondent Molly Ball, who’s written a book about U.S. Condominium Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Ball says Pelosi has fashioned her political skill and negotiating skills to outmaneuver President Trump in plenty of protection battles. Ball’s book is legendary as “Pelosi.”

You know, for the first plenty of years that Nancy Pelosi grow to be the chief of the Democratic caucus, she grow to be there when the Democrats had been in a minority, and so it grow to be a subject of getting the most she would possibly perchance perchance with Republicans who had been responsible. And likewise you dispute a collection of tales. One who comes to mind is when Tom DeLay, the congressman from Texas, known as her to boom that they’d to lop the collection of Democrats on one in all the committees after this had all been agreed to. And she or he surely showed some backbone. How did she reply to him?

BALL: I surely luxuriate in this reply. I surely luxuriate in what she talked about to him when he told her that he grow to be going to return on this agreement she’d made with the Republican speaker on the time. She talked about, lifestyles on this planet as you realize this is able to perchance now not be the an identical when you persist on this thought. So she grow to be very worthy laying down a marker that talked about – and in boom that they tried to argue along with her. They talked about, oh, we will high-tail out and badmouth you in the media when you attain this. She talked about, I manufacture now not care. They talked about, effectively, surely, no, this is extra healthy for you. You catch a greater percentage of the seats if the committee is smaller. She talked about, I manufacture now not care. We had an agreement. We’re sticking to the agreement. And lifestyles as you realize this is able to perchance now not be the an identical when you persist on this thought.

So from the very beginning, she grow to be a surely now not easy chief. She grow to be a surely stable chief. I beget she seen the leaders who’d come sooner than her as being a chunk of bit frail-willed and letting people catch away with too worthy. And so at different points as minority chief sooner than becoming speaker, different what she grow to be doing grow to be making an strive to instill a device of social gathering discipline and catch up the Democratic caucus to the muse that they wanted to work as a unit if they had been going to maintain any roughly leverage in negotiations with the majority. And it is miles silent, I beget, the No. 1 factor that she says to and about her caucus this day. She says, our vary is our energy. Our team spirit is our power.

DAVIES: And we purchased to work as a gaggle. It surely is intelligent on myth of when you can also very effectively be in the minority, you would possibly want to know the device some distance you can also push, marvelous? I imply, and fragment of that entails radiant the conditions right via which the Republican leaders will need some Democratic votes on myth of their possess caucus grow to be restive and a few of them would now not affiliate with leadership. And so it be one factor to be now not easy and expose steel, but to attain it effectively, you surely must maintain accomplished the homework and know precisely where you stand, where the votes are, marvelous?

BALL: That is marvelous. And I beget the diversified form of favourite note in Nancy Pelosi’s vocabulary is leverage. She continuously is conscious of where these stress points are, is conscious of precisely what her leverage is. Usually it be that, as you issue, the opposition is split, and which implies that if the Democrats are unified, they maintain got different leverage on myth of the majority needs their votes. One other factor is correct radiant what the priorities are. So in quite a lot of the negotiations with the Republican majority in the previous couple of years, she knew that they wished to develop military spending. So in divulge to catch that, she grow to be going to require them to develop some home spending or to provide protection to some home spending that the Democrats cared about. So radiant these stress points, radiant what it is miles your opponent values in the negotiation, permits her to to maximize that leverage.

And then correct the truth that she is so efficient – it turns into a form of virtuous cycle, I dispute that you just can issue, that on myth of she’s so a hit at conserving the Democratic caucus united, it provides her different credibility in that negotiation to boom, I will raise along all of my votes. Can you attain that? Attributable to I maintain never seen you attain that, but you maintain seen me attain that plenty.

DAVIES: In 2006, the Democrats catch the majority in Congress. She then turns into speaker the next January. And then in 2008, Barack Obama wins the White Condominium. And Pelosi is speaker at a time when the Democrats lend a hand watch over the White Condominium and each houses of Congress. And likewise you maintain a president with an ambitious protection agenda. And there had been things they took on luxuriate in the Realistic Care Act. But it be intelligent that you just write that one in all the toughest things for her grow to be facing President Obama. What grow to be laborious about that?

BALL: I manufacture now not dispute she would issue that he grow to be laborious to tackle. I beget she – they – the two of them grew to grow to be very finish. And she or he cherished that relationship very worthy. And I beget he came to admire her as effectively. But this grow to be a normal refrain right via the Obama administration from Democrats in the Condominium and Senate. They correct never felt that Obama grow to be fully engaged with the Congress and knew his device across the Congress. Having most intelligent been a senator for about a years, never having been in the Condominium and, you realize, now not being the form of schmoozer who’s continuously having people over to the White Condominium and wining and dining representatives and so forth, quite a lot of the Condominium Democrats had been in overall pissed off with President Obama’s negotiating abilities, felt that he grow to be giving freely too worthy on the entrance discontinue and wasn’t maximizing leverage. So when you can also imagine, when you can also very effectively be anyone luxuriate in Nancy Pelosi who values leverage, that’s going to be extraordinarily traumatic.

DAVIES: Correct. Well, and she grow to be pissed off, as many in Congress had been, that the Obama administration would desire Congress to surely draft a majority of these surely serious pieces of guidelines, virtually as if – I beget you write – the Democrats in Congress felt that the Obama group wished to catch credit ranking for these protection initiatives but now not catch their fingers dirty in surely doing the work of creating things occur. And then I dispute the diversified factor grow to be that Obama tended to dispute he grow to be going to catch Republican strengthen. And she or he would dispute him, no, they’re going to string you along after which vote in opposition to you after which blame Democrats for all the things that goes nefarious.

BALL: That is marvelous. She had had different journey staring at how the Republicans did alternate and had grow to be, I beget, entertaining wisely cynical about their willingness to work in a bipartisan type. So entertaining worthy from the beginning, you realize, you talked about that Obama came in with this ambitious protection agenda. He furthermore, obviously, came in with a crashing economy. And so the first divulge of alternate grow to be to strive to attain something about that. And Obama surely did dispute that on myth of the jam grow to be so dire and on myth of he had speed on this message of form of uniting the nation and on myth of he came in with this very stable reputation, he map that he would possibly perchance perchance catch some Republican strengthen.

But the Republicans entertaining worthy determined on the outset that that grow to be something they weren’t going to attain. And Nancy Pelosi grew to grow to be a notable foil for them, in fragment on myth of Obama grow to be so standard, marvelous? And they would possibly perchance perchance continuously issue, effectively, you realize, we luxuriate in Obama comely, but Nancy Pelosi and the Washington Democrats, they are the problem right here. They’re these shifting into the device in which. They’re these who also can merely now not work with us. And it wasn’t marvelous. She would’ve been willing to work across the aisle if she believed that they had been surely going to tackle her. But she furthermore wasn’t naive sufficient to dispute that they had been completely trusty in all of their protestations.

DAVIES: What grow to be Nancy Pelosi’s position in getting the Realistic Care Act handed?

BALL: She grow to be surely instrumental to its passage, and I manufacture now not dispute that her position has been fully liked. Quite a bit of the histories of the Realistic Care Act maintain centered on President Obama or maintain centered on the topic of getting it via the Senate. But she grow to be key to getting it via the Condominium. And now not most intelligent that – when the Democrats lost their 60-vote majority in the Senate and had to surely initiate from scratch, there had been different people in the White Condominium in the Obama administration who wished to provide up, who map that this correct wasn’t going to be conceivable. It grow to be too titanic a hill to climb, and it grow to be having a explore politically toxic as effectively, and perchance they must toggle encourage their ambitions and capture a explore at for something a chunk of bit smaller, something that can perchance perchance not be surely neatly-liked but would perchance correct prolong the collection of young people with effectively being insurance. And Nancy Pelosi grow to be the one who in that meeting grew to grow to be to President Obama and talked about, Mr. President, I do know there are people urging you to capture what she known as the namby-pamby ability, and she grow to be the one who stiffened his backbone. Now, the president and his people will dispute you that he never went wobbly, even even though there is some proof that perchance he did, but she grow to be the one who talked about, I will can allow you construct this occur. Let’s now not encourage down. We maintain come too some distance. On the lookout for to catch some form of neatly-liked catch admission to to effectively being care grow to be something that the Democrats had been making an strive to attain for the greater fragment of a century, and in boom that they had been so finish, and she grow to be now not going to let him quit at that moment.

DAVIES: Molly Ball is national political correspondent for Time. Her new book is legendary as “Pelosi.” We are going to continue our conversation after this short ruin. Right here’s FRESH AIR.


DAVIES: Right here’s FRESH AIR. We’re talking with Molly Ball. She’s national political correspondent for Time and a political analyst for CNN. Her new biography of Condominium Speaker Nancy Pelosi is legendary as “Pelosi.”

So the Democrats lost lend a hand watch over of Congress in 2010. That made Nancy Pelosi now minority chief. And then in 2016, Donald Trump surprises each person by a hit the presidential election. She’s purchased a new president she’ll need to contend with. So how did she put together facing him? What ability did she capture?

BALL: Well, you would possibly want to endure in mind that, initially, no one, including Donald Trump, anticipated him to grab that election in 2016. So it grow to be comparatively a jolt to each person in politics, Nancy Pelosi incorporated. And, furthermore, no one knew what to rely on of from him as president on myth of he had talked about so many conflicting things in divulge to catch elected, had had so many different personas from form of conservative Republican to liberal Fresh York Democrat. And he’d offered himself simultaneously as this fighter for the marvelous and furthermore as this deal-maker. And, the truth is, people – different these that voted for him observed him as extra practical than Hillary Clinton, anyone who would be ready to work across the aisle.

So being the outcomes-oriented, operational individual that she is, Nancy Pelosi didn’t exhaust different time recovering from the shock of Donald Trump’s election. She in the present day began to judge, how can I contend with him? And they purchased on the telephone, and he talked about some very effective things to her. And her very first map, even though, grow to be, I surely need to provide protection to the Realistic Care Act, on myth of she knew that with Republicans, the like minded factor that had stopped Republicans from repealing the Realistic Care Act sooner than grow to be that President Obama would’ve vetoed it. But now that they’d the majority in each houses of Congress and the presidency, it grow to be a surely precise probability. So she in the present day kicked into high equipment making an strive to be sure the Realistic Care Act would now not be repealed. And that grow to be her very first priority.

DAVIES: In 2018, the Democrats retook Congress with a new wave of enthusiasm and a new wave of girls people running for office and being elected to Congress. This presented a subject for Nancy Pelosi. I imply, there had been different new people in Congress who didn’t know her as effectively, and she and the diversified two top leaders in Congress had been all of their 70s and there grow to be a riot of kinds. What satisfied her she need to cease on? How did she contend with this?

BALL: She talked about after the 2016 election that if Hillary Clinton had won, she would possibly perchance need stepped down, she would possibly perchance need retired on myth of there would be a girl on the desk. Being the like minded woman chief – top chief of either social gathering in Congress or the White Condominium, she has spent most of her occupation being the like minded woman on the desk when the president meets with the tip leaders of Congress, and she believes that that’s surely major. So some people don’t judge she surely would’ve stepped down. She absolutely has a prolonged characterize of refusing to step down, even after a loss. But she did issue that she would’ve map to be that and that she stayed in titanic fragment on myth of she believed there wanted to be a girl at that negotiating desk.

And then furthermore, correct her capabilities as a negotiator, seeing what the Democrats had been going to be up in opposition to with the Republicans in power in each houses of Congress and the White Condominium, believing that they wanted the most neatly-behaved person in these negotiations and believing that that grow to be her.

DAVIES: After the Democrats took lend a hand watch over of the Condominium in 2018 after which Pelosi would quickly be speaker again, she had precise leverage in facing Donald Trump, which didn’t occur in the first two years of his term. How did things switch? There grow to be an early meeting at which she made comparatively a statement.

BALL: That is marvelous. Rapidly after that 2018 election, you endure in mind there grow to be this high-stakes funds negotiation going on between the two events that ended in a authorities shutdown. And sooner than that, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer went to the White Condominium to meet with the president. And Trump, as he’s accomplished in about a of these settings, determined to invite the click to cease and movie this negotiation that they map grow to be going to be non-public. And at one level, they’re going backward and forward about things luxuriate in the border wall and whether the authorities’s going to complete down.

And Trump, form of virtually as an aside, says, effectively, you realize, Nancy’s purchased a laborious time marvelous now on myth of she doesn’t maintain different strengthen in her possess social gathering. He’s relating to the leadership fight that she grow to be in to salvage the speakership. And she or he in the present day cuts him off, doesn’t let him manufacture and says, Mr. President, please don’t symbolize the energy that I raise to this meeting because the chief of the Condominium Democrats.

So she grow to be interrupting him. She grow to be inserting him in his subject. She grow to be refusing to be form of insulted in that device. And I beget that made a vast impression. But what made a ideal bigger impression grow to be when she and Senator Schumer walked out of that meeting, walked out the doors of the White Condominium. And she or he positioned on that reddish-orange coat and these spherical tortoiseshell sun shades and proper grinned a enormous grin.

And there is an – that image of that moment form of in the present day grew to grow to be iconic because the epitome of the woman who would possibly perchance perchance build Trump in his subject. And on myth of there grow to be this wave of girls people’s political activism that began with Trump’s election and has continued ever since, on myth of there is so worthy arouse on the left toward Trump and the Trump administration, I beget that image in the present day caught fire as form of the fighter that Democrats wanted, the establish who they felt would possibly perchance perchance finally surely come up for them and withstand Trump. And that’s the explanation been her subject ever since.

DAVIES: You know, it be intelligent. You construct the level plenty in the book of how outcomes-oriented she is, you realize? It’s now not – doesn’t subject whether you don’t luxuriate in me or whether you construct fun of me in public if we catch major things accomplished for the American people – and proper tries now not to catch wrathful about the total emotional stuff that can catch in the device in which. That talked about, did you ever explore her lose her mood?

BALL: There would possibly be a chunk of-identified incident that’s a ideal illustration of this from 2014. So she’s minority chief as we reveal. The Republicans are in lend a hand watch over of the Condominium. And there is some speeches going on, as they in overall are, on the bottom of the Condominium. And a Republican member of Congress, Tom Marino, starts form of taunting her. He’s asserting, you realize, it is seemingly you’ll perchance perchance perchance’ve mounted immigration when you had been in lend a hand watch over, Madam Speaker. But you didn’t attain it. And he’s insulting her intelligence. He’s insulting her skill.

So he gets accomplished talking. And likewise you can also very effectively explore, in a partial device, on, luxuriate in, the C-SPAN recording of this, you can also explore her marching across the bottom, chasing him down and wagging her finger at him. And what she’s asserting is, you can also very effectively be a mere person. You also can very effectively be a mere person. And he recounted this later form of terrorized that she – and her colleagues virtually had to drag her away from him on myth of she grow to be so incensed by what he’d accused her of.

DAVIES: I wonder when you can also dispute us a little about how she’s going to tackle the challenges presented by the coronavirus pandemic. I imply, there are reasonable challenges. How does the Condominium characteristic? How will you exercise oversight over the manager branch with out public hearings and workers being on peep? How attain you vote? What attain you explore?

BALL: Yeah. Clearly, it be a vast public protection subject. And it be furthermore a vast logistical subject. And I manufacture now not dispute the Congress has realized either fragment of that but. She’s been wrathful about the negotiations toward these Four huge bills that maintain already been handed, spending virtually $Three trillion to strive to lend a hand, you realize, workers and businesses and the effectively being care system afloat. And the work there is now not achieved. I beget she regards that as a partial success. She silent thinks that extra need to be accomplished.

And in phrases of the logistics, you realize, the Home is a surely worn-long-established subject. And there had been some efforts to strive to establish out a device for them to meet remotely or attain something else. And that roughly purchased poleaxed bipartisanship, it is seemingly you’ll perchance perchance perchance issue, where the Republicans would now not conform to it. And it be grow to be this total highly charged political fight, as fully all the things is on the present time.

So we will explore. We maintain, you realize, the Senate coming encourage this week. The Home is supposed to return encourage in some type subsequent week. And this could be an actual subject to explore whether they’ll put together these two simultaneous issues, each the protection yelp – this is a Congress that wasn’t functioning seriously effectively sooner than they’d to cease dwelling and build on masks – and furthermore the brand new logistical issues of the virus.

DAVIES: Molly Ball, thanks so worthy for spending a while with us.

BALL: Thank you so worthy for having me.

DAVIES: Molly Ball is national political correspondent for Time and an analyst for CNN. Her new book is “Pelosi.” Developing, Kevin Whitehead reviews a new album by saxophonist Dayna Stephens’ trio. He says their improvised grace appears oddly connected now. Right here’s FRESH AIR.


Copyright © 2020 NPR. All rights reserved. Talk over with our net space phrases of spend and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further recordsdata.

NPR transcripts are created on a speed time limit by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced the spend of a proprietary transcription route of developed with NPR. This newsletter also can merely now not be in its last form and would possibly perchance merely be up up to now or revised in the ruin. Accuracy and availability also can merely vary. The authoritative characterize of NPR’s programming is the audio characterize.